Skip to main content

Comparison between two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco

The two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco whose 2017 Financial statement links are provided below: WALMART https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ wmt/financials?query=income- statement COSTCO https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ cost/financials?query=income- statement Both organizations are well known brands and position themselves well with their customer base. Walmart’s value proposition is “We save people money so they can live better”. On the other hand, Costco’s value proposition is “All-in-one convenience and everyday affordability”. Both retailers focus on cost saving for their customers. Looking at their financial statements and by analyzing them a few key areas are evident when comparing the two organization. Looking at the current ratio and quick ratio we can determine the short-term solvency of each organization. The current ratio can be determined by dividing the assets by the liabilities. Walmart’s current ratio sits at 0.86 while Costco’s sits at 0.99. The quick ratio is c...

Ethics and Environmental Concerns

 “Environmental ethics is a branch of ethics that studies the relation of human beings and the environment and how ethics play a role in this. Environmental ethics believe that humans are a part of society as well as other living creatures, which includes plants and animals. These items are a very important part of the world and are considered to be a functional part of human life. Thus, it is essential that every human being respect and honor this and use morals and ethics when dealing with these creatures.” (Rinkesh, 2018, para. 1).
To answer the first question, we will say
DDT have been banned in the United States because, after studies, they are harmful to human health and the environment.
From what is said above, buying land in Mexico, importing US DDT, growing larger crops, and exporting elsewhere just as in the United States should be discouraged.
Today, several harvests made with pesticides are being exported to poor and developing countries, putting the future of an entire world at risk.
Many studies have shown that these pesticides have adverse effects on people and nursing mothers. On the environmental side, these pesticides are very dangerous and cause enormous damage to young people and children.
It is not enough to say that Mexico allows the use of pesticides, the most important is why this is allowed, and what precautions have been taken in Mexico to deal with the problem that it could cause.
Regarding ethical duties that the corporation should have to the workers in Mexico, the neighboring landowners, and the USA consumers about the potential dangers of using DDT, I think It is the corporations’ ethical responsibility to stop the production of such pesticides that are banned in the United States. The DDT manufactures must introspect and understand its accountabilities and responsibilities towards all its stakeholders. Further, supplying hazardous pesticides would tarnish its image in long run.
Finally, DDT manufacturers must invest more in research and development activities that can create environmentally friendly pesticides, as much as they do in the development of more effective DDTs.

Sources:
Associated Press (2014, Mar 4).  Chevron wins US legal battle against Ecuadorian court’s $9bn ruling. The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/mar/04/chevron-ecuador-court-ruling-rainforest-billions
Donald, A. B. (2018). The Ethical Dimensions of Global Environmental Issues. Retrieved from: https://www.amacad.org/content/publications/pubContent.aspx?d=1292
James, B. (2012). Business Ethics. V.1. Retrieved from: http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/business-ethics/index.html
Rutledge, L. (2006). The Fable of the Bees: American Entomologist. 52(3), 134-136. Retrieved from:  http://tinyurl.com/ov2arlb
Keefe, P. (2012, Jan 9). Reversal of Fortune: A crusading lawyer helped Ecuadorans secure a huge environmental judgment against Chevron. But did it go too far? The New Yorker.  Retrieved from: http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/01/09/reversal-of-fortune-patrick-radden-keefe
Rapoza, K. (2013, May 28). Activity Shareholders Want Chevron CEO Watson Fired. Forbes. Retrieved from:  http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/05/28/chevron-ceo-watson-to-face-unruly-crowd-at-shareholder-meeting/
Rinkesh (2018). What are Environmental Ethics? Retrieved from: https://www.conserve-energy-future.com/environmental-ethics.php

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A trip to TAKI, West Bengal , India

                                   As Bangldesh looks on the bank of Ichamoti, from TAKI, West Bengal. Take a closed look, a cattle corpse i s floating on the river bed, near the Bangladeshi bank. Victim of transborder cattle smuggling. I am not sure how young generation would react to the name of yester year’s one of the most popular writer portraying the essence of rural Bengal, its pains and joys, prosperity and poverty and off course the thread of society; Bibhuti Bhusan Bandopadhyay. His simplicity was eminent in is writing; that was best projected by famous film director Satyojit Roy in his internationally acclaimed films like ‘Pother Panchali’, ‘Aparajito’ et el.  At the age of 9, I read ‘Pother Panchali’. Though I was not matured, enough to comprehend its intrinsic message of the content but the very story left a pugmark in my mind. I became more interested about the author later. ...

If you were assigned to sell a product called “Sweet Treats” with the slogan, “so sweet, it will make you tweet,” but you thought the product tasted sour, and not at all sweet, what would you do?

Often, celebrities contract to endorse a product, but should they use the product regularly, or even like the product before they are allowed to claim that they “endorse” the product? If celebrity is lying, that is endorsing a product he/she does not use/consume then the ad should be pulled.  The Federal Trade Commission requirement that ads or sponsored social media posts indicate so - is not enough to inform consumers. (Robert, 2017) So, yes, a celebrity who endorses a product should at least appear in public using the product. Examples go in the opposite direction, instead of claiming to use a product but not doing so, which would be lying, the Kardashians post product endorsements across several social media platforms either without disclosing it is an ad or waiting until hours or days after the initial post to do so. According to the the organization Truth in Advertising (TINA.org) The delay allows avid followers to see the initial post as a testimonial instead of as an ad. (K...

TATA SKY OR TATA SQUEEZE!!

This is my debut article in the interest of Indian consumers. Just my humble contribution; to enlighten them about the product or service of famous TATA SKY. Amir Khan, the brand ambassador or Mr. Ratan Tata, the person at the helm of all TATA affairs, would be ashamed of TATA SKY, once they know instead of making the life “JINA LALA”; it is turning the life “JINA HARAM” with TATA SKY at times. With much expectation I switch over to TATA SKY from local cable operator in the month of May this year. Within six months twice I they have replaced their set top box. They went out of order and it is under warranty for one year. Every time I called their customer care, they receive they call as if your are naïve. They take no less than half an hour, to guide you to switch off and on , take out their digi-card and put it back, whether you are young or old caring a fig for that! Surprisingly their call centre’s number is not toll free! You are put on hold for ten minutes and another twenty m...