Skip to main content

Comparison between two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco

The two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco whose 2017 Financial statement links are provided below: WALMART https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ wmt/financials?query=income- statement COSTCO https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ cost/financials?query=income- statement Both organizations are well known brands and position themselves well with their customer base. Walmart’s value proposition is “We save people money so they can live better”. On the other hand, Costco’s value proposition is “All-in-one convenience and everyday affordability”. Both retailers focus on cost saving for their customers. Looking at their financial statements and by analyzing them a few key areas are evident when comparing the two organization. Looking at the current ratio and quick ratio we can determine the short-term solvency of each organization. The current ratio can be determined by dividing the assets by the liabilities. Walmart’s current ratio sits at 0.86 while Costco’s sits at 0.99. The quick ratio is c...

Haier Group Company


Haier Group Company is one of the world top ranked makers of white goods and other home appliances based in China.According to Euromonitor’s 2016 survey data, the haier brand occupied the world’s largest market share in white goods for the 8th consecutive year.

I ‘d like to lecture an important event, usually called by Chinese populace “ Zhang Ruiyang smashed the refrigerators into pieces” which occurred in its early days of this mammoth company.

In 1984 the current CEO Zhang Ruiyang was an assistant manager of city’s household appliance division and was appointed to be managing director of this collective plant -Qingdao Refrigerator General Factory, the predecessor of haier group. At that time, this plant suffered from debt of over CNY1.4 million and was close to bankruptcy.

The broader context is in the initial stage of opening-up and reform, the national average of workers only reached CNY 96(equivalent to USD 14.5 of today). Unit price of refrigerator was equal to one worker’s two-year wages. Refrigerator was still a rare luxury item in China.

In 1985, one customer came to complaint about product quality. So Zhang and his leadership conducted inspections through the entire inventory of 400 sets of refrigerators and found out nearly 20 percent was under quality standard. Zhang convened manager leadership and employees to talk about what to do with these inferior refrigerators. He sent out staff for the sledgehammers and ordered relative responsible individuals to smash all of 76 inferior ones into pieces .The then-product capacity per month was 80 sets.

All staff blamed themselves and stepped forward to take responsibility and persuaded the managing directors to take another solution: either relative responsible managers resign or internal staff bought out all unqualified products paying by deducting from their salary.

But Zhang stick to his decision and called out the relative supervisors to stand out and smash refrigerators in person. Every staff watching alongside could fell vicarious punishment and some event burst into tears. He said” Destroy them! If we pass these 76 refrigerators for sale, we'll be continuing a mistake that has all but bankrupted our company.”

The refrigerators’ destruction marked the arrival of new era in which Chinese manufactures were going through the awareness of quality. And more significant outcomes were that it drove industry competition to healthier directions and further pushed forward the development of Chinese manufacturing industry. At the beginning of reform and opening up, in the Chinese consumer marketproducts were classified into four types: Standard products, degraded second and third product, internal processing products. From Zhang smashing the refrigerators, the product standard was emphasized then lead to develop a collectivistic orientation toward product quality.

Although three decades passed, the incisive impression of good quality about haier brands draw out by” Zhang smashed refrigerators ”  has still influences on Chinese current customers. Nearly everyone knows this anecdote.

Of course, first this was a quality problem. But how to deal with this problem, to some extent it demonstrated the standard set by the leader in terms of right and wrong behavior. And this event marked one indelible imprint on the minds of all staff to reinforce appropriate conduct.

Just like Kohlberg’s cognitive moral development theory explicates, conventional individuals look outside themselves to seek guidelines and expectations from significant models. Zhang clarified his expectations toward all staff ”sub-standard products are waste.”

When I read this discussion assignment, immediately I thought about this anecdote. It marked the beginning of one company legend. And not only the focus on quality is internalized into the daily conduct of all staff but also build the trust reputation among the customers. In 2016,  Haier was also counted amongst the top 3 in Fortune’s “most admired Chinese companies” – taking the top spot in the electronics category. Indeed, Haier people hold a certain high level of job well-being.

Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haier

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A trip to TAKI, West Bengal , India

                                   As Bangldesh looks on the bank of Ichamoti, from TAKI, West Bengal. Take a closed look, a cattle corpse i s floating on the river bed, near the Bangladeshi bank. Victim of transborder cattle smuggling. I am not sure how young generation would react to the name of yester year’s one of the most popular writer portraying the essence of rural Bengal, its pains and joys, prosperity and poverty and off course the thread of society; Bibhuti Bhusan Bandopadhyay. His simplicity was eminent in is writing; that was best projected by famous film director Satyojit Roy in his internationally acclaimed films like ‘Pother Panchali’, ‘Aparajito’ et el.  At the age of 9, I read ‘Pother Panchali’. Though I was not matured, enough to comprehend its intrinsic message of the content but the very story left a pugmark in my mind. I became more interested about the author later. ...

If you were assigned to sell a product called “Sweet Treats” with the slogan, “so sweet, it will make you tweet,” but you thought the product tasted sour, and not at all sweet, what would you do?

Often, celebrities contract to endorse a product, but should they use the product regularly, or even like the product before they are allowed to claim that they “endorse” the product? If celebrity is lying, that is endorsing a product he/she does not use/consume then the ad should be pulled.  The Federal Trade Commission requirement that ads or sponsored social media posts indicate so - is not enough to inform consumers. (Robert, 2017) So, yes, a celebrity who endorses a product should at least appear in public using the product. Examples go in the opposite direction, instead of claiming to use a product but not doing so, which would be lying, the Kardashians post product endorsements across several social media platforms either without disclosing it is an ad or waiting until hours or days after the initial post to do so. According to the the organization Truth in Advertising (TINA.org) The delay allows avid followers to see the initial post as a testimonial instead of as an ad. (K...

TATA SKY OR TATA SQUEEZE!!

This is my debut article in the interest of Indian consumers. Just my humble contribution; to enlighten them about the product or service of famous TATA SKY. Amir Khan, the brand ambassador or Mr. Ratan Tata, the person at the helm of all TATA affairs, would be ashamed of TATA SKY, once they know instead of making the life “JINA LALA”; it is turning the life “JINA HARAM” with TATA SKY at times. With much expectation I switch over to TATA SKY from local cable operator in the month of May this year. Within six months twice I they have replaced their set top box. They went out of order and it is under warranty for one year. Every time I called their customer care, they receive they call as if your are naïve. They take no less than half an hour, to guide you to switch off and on , take out their digi-card and put it back, whether you are young or old caring a fig for that! Surprisingly their call centre’s number is not toll free! You are put on hold for ten minutes and another twenty m...