Skip to main content

Comparison between two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco

The two retail companies picked are Walmart and Costco whose 2017 Financial statement links are provided below: WALMART https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ wmt/financials?query=income- statement COSTCO https://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/ cost/financials?query=income- statement Both organizations are well known brands and position themselves well with their customer base. Walmart’s value proposition is “We save people money so they can live better”. On the other hand, Costco’s value proposition is “All-in-one convenience and everyday affordability”. Both retailers focus on cost saving for their customers. Looking at their financial statements and by analyzing them a few key areas are evident when comparing the two organization. Looking at the current ratio and quick ratio we can determine the short-term solvency of each organization. The current ratio can be determined by dividing the assets by the liabilities. Walmart’s current ratio sits at 0.86 while Costco’s sits at 0.99. The quick ratio is c

How Insider Trading impacts the whole system


Many people presume that insider trading is always illegal. The term has been associated with scandals and names such as Enron, celebrity businesswoman Martha Stewart, and former Goldman Sachs director Rajat Gupta (Tang, 2017). Legal insider trading happens when directors of the company purchase or sell shares, but they disclose their transactions legally.

However, the term “insider trading" is mostly used to describe a practice in which an insider party trades based on non-public material information gained through the performance of the insider’s obligation at the company, in violation of other relationships of faith and assurance or otherwise when the non-public information was stolen from the company. In other words, insider trading is buying, selling or dealing in securities, bonds, and stocks of a company by a director, manager, or employee of the company who has confidential information that is not accessible to the public (LawTeacher, n.d.).

There are a variety of ways that insider trading can be conducted:

Members of an organization purchasing a security. Employees or members of publicly traded companies are in key positions to access information that would not otherwise be available to the general public. Some of them buy and sell securities based on this information and hope to profit from it when the news is eventually released. Employees are given stock options so there are legal instances where they can purchase shares. However, the rules are complicated and the line is often blurred between what is a legal form of insider trading and what is not.

Professionals who do business with the corporation. Bankers, lawyers, paralegals, and brokers are but a few of the consultants who have access to confidential documents of their corporate clients. They may choose to abuse this privilege as an opportunity to make a quick buck through insider trading.

Friends, family, and acquaintances of corporate employees. Corporate employees often share information within their own circles that is not shared with Wall Street and the general public. Sometimes these disclosures are made innocently, but other times they are made with the intention of allowing their friends to trade securities with an advantage that other investors would not have. Employees may give these tips to help out a friend in a tough time or they may be asking their friends to pay them a small incentive. Employees may trade through their friends and acquaintances since they are less likely to be scrutinized by the SEC than the employees themselves.

Government officials. Officials of different government agencies can gain access to confidential information through the execution of their duties. They may conduct insider trading with this information.

Hackers, corporate spies, and other thieves. Clever criminals find a number of ways to gain access to corporate information which they can use to conduct securities fraud.

In the Enron case, several managers sold all their Enron stock about an hour before it became public knowledge that the company was not worth as much as everyone thought. Should a manager be punished for acting prudently based on knowledge they have discovered honestly only because the general public does not have that knowledge?

To trumpet information without appropriate approval and decision making from the top management is highly unethical and illegal. Hence, a punishable offense to the culprit if and when found guilty. There should be legal boundaries to restrain excesses as well as corrupt practices happening within the firm. Regarding the case of Pete Rose, it is seen as a case of an insider who knows the quality of his team thus taking a bet on their behalf without their consent and k knowledge. The success and failure of his crew were solely dependent on pre-information about the quality of the team as provided by Rose.

Although the corporate aspect of insider trading might be considered a legal action, which is likely to exonerate him if he reports his intention within two working days. He ought to be punished for his unethical behavior as his actions are a clear indication of a conflict of interest.

Should managers be required to disclose private information they have that might influence the investment decisions of the public?  Also, address the question of timing about the dissemination of information: is it enough to share information on a public website or should a formal press conference be required? 

Yes, managers must disclose information that might influence the investment decision of the public conforming to the rules of SEC, that disclosure should be made public within a space of two working days. A tipster who has understood that he or she has breached trust is liable to be punished as seen in insider trade. Changes in insider holdings are sent to the SEC electronically as a Form 4, which details a company's insider trade or loans (Investopedia, 2017).

 

 

References:

Legal Insider Trading? This Is What It Is And How It ... (n.d.). Retrieved from http://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/finance/328535-legal-insider-trading-this-

Insider Trading - Investopedia. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/insidertrading.asp

Insider Trading And Business Ethics - Law Teacher. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.lawteacher.net/free-law-essays/business-law/insider-trading-and-busi

What Is Insider Trading & How To Avoid It - Definition ... (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.moneycrashers.com/what-is-insider-trading-definition-laws-cases/

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. (2013, Jan 15). Insider Trading. Retrieved from: http://www.sec.gov/answers/insider.htm

Newkirk, T., Robertson, M. (1998, Sept 19). Speech to SEC Staff: Insider Trading—A U.S. Perspective. Retrieved from: http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/speecharchive/1998/spch221.htm

(2014, Sept 18). What Investors Can Learn from Insider Trading. Investopedia. Retrieved from: http://www.investopedia.com/articles/02/061202.asp


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TATA SKY OR TATA SQUEEZE!!

This is my debut article in the interest of Indian consumers. Just my humble contribution; to enlighten them about the product or service of famous TATA SKY. Amir Khan, the brand ambassador or Mr. Ratan Tata, the person at the helm of all TATA affairs, would be ashamed of TATA SKY, once they know instead of making the life “JINA LALA”; it is turning the life “JINA HARAM” with TATA SKY at times. With much expectation I switch over to TATA SKY from local cable operator in the month of May this year. Within six months twice I they have replaced their set top box. They went out of order and it is under warranty for one year. Every time I called their customer care, they receive they call as if your are naïve. They take no less than half an hour, to guide you to switch off and on , take out their digi-card and put it back, whether you are young or old caring a fig for that! Surprisingly their call centre’s number is not toll free! You are put on hold for ten minutes and another twenty m

A trip to TAKI, West Bengal , India

                                   As Bangldesh looks on the bank of Ichamoti, from TAKI, West Bengal. Take a closed look, a cattle corpse i s floating on the river bed, near the Bangladeshi bank. Victim of transborder cattle smuggling. I am not sure how young generation would react to the name of yester year’s one of the most popular writer portraying the essence of rural Bengal, its pains and joys, prosperity and poverty and off course the thread of society; Bibhuti Bhusan Bandopadhyay. His simplicity was eminent in is writing; that was best projected by famous film director Satyojit Roy in his internationally acclaimed films like ‘Pother Panchali’, ‘Aparajito’ et el.  At the age of 9, I read ‘Pother Panchali’. Though I was not matured, enough to comprehend its intrinsic message of the content but the very story left a pugmark in my mind. I became more interested about the author later. The river ‘Ichamoti’ ; again and again surfaced in his rendition; so in my mind. I always cher

If you were assigned to sell a product called “Sweet Treats” with the slogan, “so sweet, it will make you tweet,” but you thought the product tasted sour, and not at all sweet, what would you do?

Often, celebrities contract to endorse a product, but should they use the product regularly, or even like the product before they are allowed to claim that they “endorse” the product? If celebrity is lying, that is endorsing a product he/she does not use/consume then the ad should be pulled.  The Federal Trade Commission requirement that ads or sponsored social media posts indicate so - is not enough to inform consumers. (Robert, 2017) So, yes, a celebrity who endorses a product should at least appear in public using the product. Examples go in the opposite direction, instead of claiming to use a product but not doing so, which would be lying, the Kardashians post product endorsements across several social media platforms either without disclosing it is an ad or waiting until hours or days after the initial post to do so. According to the the organization Truth in Advertising (TINA.org) The delay allows avid followers to see the initial post as a testimonial instead of as an ad. (Kilke